In this messy lawsuit, a broker-dealer sued its computer programmers and their firm on a theory of civil conspiracy. The programmers moved for summary judgment. The broker-dealer argued that the programmers engaged in tortious acts in furtherance of the conspiracy. But the programmers were granted summary judgment. The broker-dealer appealed,…
Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog
No Jurisdiction To Hear Appeal Of Denial Of Motion To Dismiss
Nicor, a gas utility company, claimed that a ruptured water main caused damage to a gas main and caused a natural gas outage. So Nicor sued the Village of Wilmette, claiming that the Village negligently maintained the water main. The Village moved to dismiss Nicor’s amended complaint, but the motion…
Illinois Supreme Court Rules Premarital Agreement A Separate Claim From Divorce
Before they were married, Steven and Angela signed a premarital agreement. When the couple was divorcing, Steven filed a motion for a declaratory judgment, seeking an order on the validity and construction of the premarital agreement. The trial court ruled that the agreement was enforceable. The trial court also granted…
Judgment Creditors Can’t Toll Time To Appeal By Asking For An Interlocutory Appeal
The D’Agostinos were embroiled in prolonged litigation with Lynch and his lawyers. After a summary judgment for more than $1.9 million in the D’Agostinos’s favor, they began supplemental proceedings to collect. More litigation ensued, including an appeal, concerning a contempt proceeding against Lynch. After all of that was resolved, the…
Pending Contempt Proceeding Renders Post Dissolution Judgment Nonfinal. Second District Illinois Appellate Court Still Split.
IRMO Schweiger continues the disagreement in the Second District Illinois Appellate Court over the appealability of a postdissolution judgment in a divorce matter when a contempt proceeding still is pending. Eugene and Jean Marie were divorced in 1990. The dissolution order required Eugene to split the proceeds with Jean Marie…
Fourth District Illinois Appellate Court Reviews Jurisdiction Issue Despite Trial Court Failure To Do So
Lee Isringhausen, an Illinois resident, contracted with APM Custom Homes, a Florida corporation, to build a home in Marco Island, Florida. Lee died before the house was built. APM returned most of the $100,000 deposit to Lee’s estate, but kept $42,500 of it as a construction-management fee. Susan Isringhausen, executor…
Parents Can Appeal Petition To Adjudicate Wardship; Opposing Brief Not Necessary For Court To Rule
Z.L., a minor who had been adopted as an infant, had reactive attachment disorder. The disorder apparently did not manifest until a few years after his adoption, when Z.L. became disruptive in the household. The State filed a petition to adjudicate wardship, with the intent to place Z.L. in a…
Partial Record Sufficient
The party appealing must provide a sufficient record for the appellate court to review, “and in the absence of such a record, the reviewing court will presume that the trial court’s order was in conformity with established legal principles and had a sufficient factual basis.” Without a sufficient record, an…
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 365 Doesn’t Save Notice Of Appeal Improperly Filed In Appellate Court
Here’s another reason to read and re-read the rules. This one involved pro se appellants who tried to appeal a summary judgment entered against them on their counterclaim against a bank. They filed their Notice of Appeal in the appellate court, not in the trial court as is required by…
Dressed Up Abuse Standard For Review Of Sanctions Order
An unhappy customer sued an auto dealership, and the dealership’s incorporator. The incorporator moved to dismiss and for sanctions. The dismissal was granted, but the sanctions motion was denied. In affirming the denial of sanctions, the First District Illinois Appellate Court embellished the typical “abuse of discretion” standard. “On review,…