Falcon Funding owned land in Elgin, Illinois. Elgin agreed to annex the land in 1991. The property never was developed. In 2005, Falcon asked the trial court to order the property disconnected from Elgin. Falcon and Elgin both asked the trial court for a summary judgment. The court denied Elgin’s…
Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog
Railroad’s Summary Judgment, Granted On Reconsideration, Reviewed De Novo
Donald Pence tripped as he walked across the railroad tracks, and fractured his wrist and shoulder. He sued the railroad for poorly maintaining the area. The railroad asked the trial court for summary judgment. The court denied the request, but on reconsideration gave the railroad summary judgment. Pence appealed. The…
Supreme Court Rule Reviewed De Novo
I get this question a lot: What is the standard of review for interpretation of a state supreme court rule? Here’s the answer: “Because Garlock’s argument involves the construction of a supreme court rule, our review is de novo … When interpreting a supreme court rule, a reviewing court should…
Doctor In Malpractice Case Gets De Novo Review In Venue Dispute
In this medical malpractice case, the appellate question is what standard of review applies to an order denying a request to change venue. Margie Kaiser had surgery at St. Joseph’s Hospital in Clinton County, Illinois. She had internal bleeding that did not resolve after the operation. She was transferred to…
“Slick Lawyer” Remark Not Enough To Reverse Doctor’s Malpractice Verdict
Sonya Wilbourn sued her doctor, Mark Cavalenes, for medical malpractice. Wilbourn claimed Cavalenes inserted the wrong size compression plate when he performed surgery on Wilbourn’s fractured femur. The jury gave a verdict in favor of Dr. Cavalenes, Wilbourn then asked for a new trial, but the trial court refused. So…
Incorrectly Coded Notice Of Appeal Sufficient To Give Federal Appellate Court Jurisdiction
Summary judgment was entered against Scot Vince in his civil rights action against Rock County, Wisconsin. Using the court’s mandatory electronic filing system, Vince’s lawyer filed a notice of appeal on the last day allowed by the rule. The system requires an event code for each document filed. Vince’s lawyer…
Dismissal For Want Of Prosecution Appealable After Time For Refiling Expires
The First District Illinois Appellate Court recently stated the rule for when a dismissal for want of prosecution becomes final and appealable. Our supreme court has recognized that if a plaintiff’s action is dismissed for want of prosecution (DWP), the plaintiff has the option, under section 13-217 of the Code…
Introduction Stricken As Argumentative
The Illinois Supreme Court rules require appellant’s merits brief to have an introductory paragraph. The introduction normally is described as the “Nature of the Action.” I often see appellant merits briefs that have long and argumentative “Nature of the Action” sections. The Second District Illinois Appellate Court recently struck one…
Voidness Of Judgment Considered Despite Late Appeal
American Access Casualty Company insured Aaron Hersey. GEICO won a negligence case against Hersey. Trying to satisfy its judgment, GEICO brought a supplemental proceeding to discover the assets of American Access Casualty Company. The trial court entered a judgment for GEICO against AACC for the amount GEICO won against Hersey.…
Two-Part Standard Of Review For Suppression Of Evidence In Entry And Detainer Case
Michael Head, a resident at a public housing apartment in Chicago, was arrested for possession of marijuana. His apartment lease prohibited him from participating in illegal drug-related activity. The Chicago Housing Authority was allowed to terminate the lease if Head was in violation. The police took the evidence against Head…