This doesn’t come up often, but the rule is good to keep tucked away for when you need it. In this medical malpractice case, the question on appeal involved the trial court’s actions after an earlier remand from the appellate court. The First District Illinois Court of Appeals stated the…
Articles Posted in Standard of Review
Procedural Unconscionability Reviewed By Manifest Weight; Substantive Unconscionability Reviewed De Novo
Ozma Tabassum sued Javed Younis were married in Canada and had one child, Azra. They moved to Illinois, where their relationship took a turn for the worse. Ozma took Azra back to her family in Canada. While in Canada, Ozma and Javed negotiated a postmarital agreement. Ozma agreed not to…
Violation Of Discovery Rule Deemed A Question Of Law
In Boyd v. City of Chicago, No. 1-06-0358 (12/5/08), the trial court precluded testimony of a fact witness. In Boyd’s appeal of an adverse jury verdict, he claimed the trial court improperly precluded his witness’s testimony as a discovery sanction. The appellate court identified the standard of review: “ Whether…
First District Illinois Appellate Court Defines Standards Of Review For Motion For New Trial And For Judgment Notwithstanding Verdict
Heather Addis sued Exelon for retaliatory discharge. Unhappy with the jury’s defense verdict, Addis moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. After those motions were denied, Addis appealed. The First District Illinois Appellate Court ruled that the two issues had different standards of review on appeal.…
First District Illinois Appellate Court States Standard Of Review For Class Certification
Affirming certification of a class of plaintiffs who allegedly were overcharged by a moving company, the First District Illinois Court of Appeals stated the standard of review for class certification: “‘The trial court has broad discretion to determine whether a proposed class satisfies the requirements for class certification and should…
Illinois Supreme Court Rules De Novo Standard Of Review Applies To Permissive Review Of Conflict Of Law Question
Michelle Townsend brought a product liability case Sears Roebuck on behalf of her minor son Jacob. Jacob was badly injured when he was run over by a lawn tractor operated in his yard. Sears allegedly designed and manufactured the tractor. The accident happened in Michigan, where Michelle and Jacob resided.…
First District Illinois Appellate Waffles Between De Novo and Abuse of Discretion Standards In Interlocutory Appeal
Blockbuster was sued in class action cases that alleged the company imposed improper penalties on customers who kept videos or DVDs longer than the prepaid period. In a Texas case, which had a class similar to the Illinois case, Blockbuster settled after the class was certified. Later, the Illinois court…
Illinois Supreme Court Spanks North Chicago Police Pension Board. Doctor’s Evidence Fails Manifest Weight Standard
While assisting an arrest, Police Officer Lawrence Wade got into a scuffle with the prisoner. Wade injured his knee, which required surgery. Ultimately, his doctor declared that Wade could not return to full patrol duty. The Police Department did not have an inside position for him, so Wade’s options were…
7th Circuit Reviews Summary Judgment For Clear Error In Non-Jury Case
A pension fund sued a partnership under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act, an amendment to ERISA, to recover an outstanding liability. The pension fund obtained summary judgment, and the partnership appealed. The standard of review was brought into question. Typically, summary judgments, including in ERISA cases, are reviewed de…
Medical Malpractice Case Illustrates Tension In Review Of Judgment Notwithstanding Verdict
Katherine Bergman’s baby died during child birth. She sued the doctor and the hospital for medical malpractice. Katherine got a verdict for more than $1.5 million. The doctor appealed, and among other things, claimed he was entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict (jnov). The First District Illinois Appellate Court affirmed…